New Rules home
Agriculture
Electricity
Environment
Equity
Finance
Governance
Information
Retail
Taxation


Climate Neutral Bonding: Building Global Warming Solutions at the State And Local Level
This February 2006 policy brief provides background and analysis to support a state or local policy that would require construction projects funded with tax-exempt bonds to result in no net increases in greenhouse gases within the community.

Bonding With the Next Generation - article by David Morris

The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives' program, Cities for Climate Protection Campaign

EPA's State and Local Climate Change Program's Financial Assitance Page - has information on funding programs designed to help individuals, community groups, small businesses, nonprofits, state and local government, and tribes overcome the financial and technical obstacles to initiating and developing projects that directly or indirectly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.


Democratic Energy: Communities and Government Supporting our Energy Future

Policy Gap: Minnesota Energy Policy vs. Minnesota Climate PolicyMinnesota Feed-In Tariff Could Lower Cost, Boost Renewables and Expand Local Ownership

By John Farrell
Institute for Local Self-Reliance

January 2008 [Download Full Report in PDF format]

Executive Summary

Several European countries, and more recently the Canadian province of Ontario, have adopted a simple yet powerful strategy to expand renewable energy and benefit local economies. It is called a feed-in tariff: a mandated, long-term premium price for renewable energy paid by the local electric utility to energy producers. Evidence shows that a feed-in tariff achieves greater results at a lower cost than do other strategies like tax incentives or renewable electricity standards.

Feed-in Tariff Benefits

Supports small-scale, grows large-scale - Germany’s feed-in tariff has led to an astonishing 20,000 MW of installed wind capacity, with 45% of turbines locally-owned. Even more remarkable, Germany had 2,500 MW of on-site solar electric at the end of 2006, about 250 times more than Minnesota despite Germany’s weaker solar resources.

Lowers costs - 20-year tariffs stabilize project revenues, lowering the cost of capital for all investors. By supporting all commercial renewable technologies, tariffs create economies of scale. And tariff rates are set to allow for reasonable profits, no more. Finally, by spreading the costs over all ratepayers, the cost to the individual household is very low. Germany’s massive expansion of renewables, for example, costs the average German household $2 per month.

Improves fairness - By enabling broad participation, feed-in tariffs are more equitable than other renewable energy policies. Current renewable electricity standards tend to favor those institutions large enough to play in a wholesale market, typically utilities and large independent power producers. Federal tax credits benefit only those with sufficient tax liability to use the credits effectively. In contrast, tariff rates adjust for size and quality of resource, allowing producers of any size and any geographic region to participate.

[Download Full Report in PDF format]

Search News Archive

Resources
Local Rules
State Rules
Regional Rules
Federal Rules