Back to top Jump to featured resources
Article, Rule filed under Energy

Vermont’s Streamlined Solar Permitting

| Written by John Farrell | 4 Comments | Updated on Jun 7, 2012 The content that follows was originally published on the Institute for Local Self-Reliance website at http://www.ilsr.org/vermonts-streamlined-solar-permitting/
Vermont-Solar-Permitting-Form

The state of Vermont has come up with a good rule for reducing the cost of solar power installations. A national study recently found that local permitting can increase the cost of residential solar by 15-20%, a problem that becomes more pressing as the cost of solar hardware falls.

Vermont’s rule shifts the burden of permitting from the project owner to the utility.  Instead of having to apply to the state’s Public Service Board for a Certificate of Public Good with a formal review and 30-day comment period, projects now automatically receive certification unless a utility raises an interconnection issue within 10 days.   The application is a single page.

The streamlined permitting policy, adopted in 2011 and expanded in 2012, applies to solar PV projects 10 kilowatts and smaller, projects that are unlikely to have a significant impact on the electric grid.

Interestingly, Vermont differs from most states in that solar permits are handled by a single state entity rather than local governments, making a state-based policy solution more amenable.

For more detail on the law, see the Vermont Energy Act of 2011.

 

Tags: / / / / / /

About John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. More

Contact John   |   View all articles by John Farrell

4 Comments

Why we pay double for solar in America (but won’t forever) | Grist said...

[...] at the top (photo taken from the Forbes post on cutting costs), and already there are policy ideas that significantly reduce these [...]

Jul 13, 2012

Why we pay double for solar in America (but won’t forever) | Grist said...

[...] U.S. solar installers (pictured in the Forbes post on cutting costs), and already there are policy ideas that significantly reduce these [...]

Jul 13, 2012

Cheaper Solar? | Hawaii Renewable Energy Alliance said...

[...] solar installers (pictured in theForbes post on cutting costs), and already there are policy ideas that significantly reduce these [...]

Aug 7, 2012

Why Americans pay double for solar (but won't forever) : Renew Economy said...

[...] at the top (photo taken from the Forbes post on cutting costs), and already there are policy ideas that significantly reduce these [...]

Sep 25, 2012